๐ฐ NEWSCUS: Tax Issues & Trends(์กฐ์ธ์ด์&ํธ๋ ๋) – The end of the simple tax-saving era, and the growing emphasis on transparency, fairness, and digital taxation(๋จ์ ์ ์ธ ์๋ ์ข ๋ฃ์ ํฌ๋ช ์ฑ, ๊ณต์ ์ฑ, ๋์งํธ ๊ณผ์ธ ๊ฐํ)
6์ ๋ท์งธ์ฃผ ์กฐ์ธ ์ด์ ๋ฐ ํธ๋ ๋ (๊ตญ๋ดยทํด์ธ ์ข ํฉ)


๐ Domestic Tax Issues (Korea)(๊ตญ๋ด ์กฐ์ธ ์ด์)
๐ โExpansion of deductions + strengthening of taxationโ(โ๊ณต์ ํ๋ + ๊ณผ์ธ ๊ฐํโ) โ A restructuring of the tax system centered on the middle class.(์ค์ฐ์ธต ์ค์ฌ ์ธ์ ์ฌํธ)
1. Strengthening the Link Between Tax Revenue and the Real Estate Market(์ธ์ยท๋ถ๋์ฐ ์ฐ๋ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๊ฐํ)
- In Seoul, increased tax revenue has led to improved fiscal capacity.(์์ธ์ ๊ธฐ์ค, ์ธ์ ์ฆ๊ฐ๋ก ์ฌ์ ์ฌ๋ ฅ ํ๋ ํ์ธ)
- Rising real estate prices and increased transaction volumes have recently boosted local tax revenues, particularly acquisition taxes.(์ต๊ทผ ๋ถ๋์ฐ ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ ์์น + ๊ฑฐ๋ ์ฆ๊ฐ๋ก ์ง๋ฐฉ์ธ(ํนํ ์ทจ๋์ธ) ์์ ์ฆ๊ฐ)
โ Key Points(ํต์ฌ ํฌ์ธํธ)
- Tax revenue is closely linked to economic conditions and asset markets.(์ธ์๋ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐยท์์ฐ์์ฅ๊ณผ ๊ฐํ๊ฒ ์ฐ๋)
- Changes in real estate policy directly impact tax revenue.(๋ถ๋์ฐ ์ ์ฑ ๋ณํ โ ๊ณง๋ฐ๋ก ์ธ์ ์ํฅ)
โ Implications(์์ฌ์ )
- Future changes in real estate regulationsโwhether eased or tightenedโmay significantly affect the stability of local government finances.(ํฅํ ๋ถ๋์ฐ ๊ท์ ์ํ vs ๊ฐํ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์ง๋ฐฉ์ฌ์ ์์ ์ฑ๋ ๋ณ๋ ๊ฐ๋ฅ)
2. Trend Toward Strengthening Gift Tax Enforcement(์ฆ์ฌ์ธ ๊ณผ์ธ ๊ฐํ ํธ๋ ๋)
- Even the use of parentsโ credit cards or financial support for living expenses can be treated as a taxable gift when it leads to asset accumulation.(๋ถ๋ชจ ์นด๋ ์ฌ์ฉ, ์ํ๋น ์ง์๋ ์์ฐ ์ถ์ ์ ์ฌ์ค์ ์ฆ์ฌ๋ก ๊ณผ์ธ ๊ฐ๋ฅ)
โ Key Points(ํต์ฌ ํฌ์ธํธ)
- The principle of ‘substance over form’ in taxation is being reinforced.(โํ์๋ณด๋ค ์ค์งโ ๊ณผ์ธ ์์น ๊ฐํ)
- Everyday transfers of funds are increasingly becoming subject to taxation.(์ผ์์ ์๊ธ ์ด์ ๋ ๊ณผ์ธ ๋์ ํ๋)
โ Implications(์์ฌ์ )
- As financial activities among younger individuals increase, the risk of gift tax exposure is also rising.(์๋ ๊ธ์ต ํ๋ ์ฆ๊ฐ โ ์ฆ์ฌ์ธ ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ ํ๋)
- The importance of tax management is growing, particularly for people in their 20s and 30s.(์ธ๋ฌด๊ด๋ฆฌ ์ค์์ฑ ์์น (ํนํ 20~30๋))
3. ์ธ์ ํํ ์ถ์ ํ๋ฆ
- ์ ๊ธฐ์ฐจ ๊ฐ๋ณ์๋น์ธ ๊ฐ๋ฉด ํ์ง ๊ฒํ ๋ฑ ์ ์ฑ ์ฑ ์ธ์ ํํ ์ ์ง์ ์ ๋ฆฌ
โ Key Points(ํต์ฌ ํฌ์ธํธ)
- ์ ๋ถ ์ฌ์ ํ๋ณด vs ์ฐ์ ์ง์์ ๊ท ํ
- ์ธ์ ๋์ ์ง์ ๋ณด์กฐ๊ธ ๋ฐฉ์ ์ ํ
โ Implications(์์ฌ์ )
- ์ธ๊ธ ํ ์ธ๋ณด๋ค โํ๊ธ์ง์ ์ ์ฑ โ ํ๋ ๊ฐ๋ฅ
- ์๋น์ ์ฒด๊ฐ ๋ถ๋ด์ ์ฆ๊ฐํ ์ ์์

๐ Key Trends in Inheritance & Gift Tax(์์ยท์ฆ์ฌ์ธ ํต์ฌ ํธ๋ ๋)
1. Inheritance Tax Reform(์์์ธ ๊ฐํธ): โShifting from Tax Rates to Deduction Structuresโ
(โ์ธ์จ๋ณด๋ค ๊ณต์ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ณํโ)
- Key discussions focus on expanding child-related deductions and increasing the basic lump-sum deduction.(์๋ ๊ณต์ ํ๋, ์ผ๊ด๊ณต์ ์ํฅ ๋ฑ์ด ํต์ฌ ๋ ผ์)
- There is also ongoing debate about lowering the top tax rate (from 50% to 40%).(์ต๊ณ ์ธ์จ ์ธํ(50% โ 40%) ๋ฐฉํฅ ์ง์ ๋ ผ์)
โ Key Points(ํต์ฌ ํฌ์ธํธ)
- A shift toward expanded deductions is easing the tax burden on the middle class.(๊ณต์ ํ๋ ์ค์ฌ โ ์ค์ฐ์ธต ์ธ๋ถ๋ด ์ํ)
- The number of taxpayers subject to inheritance tax may decrease.(์์์ธ ๋์ ์์ฒด ๊ฐ์ ๊ฐ๋ฅ)
โ Implications(์์ฌ์ )
- Inheritance tax is no longer limited to high-net-worth individuals and is becoming a broader issue affecting general households.(์์ฐ๊ฐ๋ง์ ์ธ๊ธ โ ์ผ๋ฐ ๊ฐ๊ตฌ ์ด์๋ก ํ๋)
- Tax planning strategies(์ ์ธ ์ ๋ต):
- Choosing between gifting and inheritance is becoming more important.(์ฆ์ฌ vs ์์ ์ ํ ์ค์ํด์ง)
- The number of children has emerged as a key variable in determining the scale of deductions.(โ์๋ ์ = ๊ณต์ ๊ท๋ชจโ ํต์ฌ ๋ณ์)
2. Transition from Estate Tax(์ ์ฐ์ธ) โ Inheritance Acquisition Tax(์ ์ฐ์ทจ๋์ธ ์ ํ ๋ ผ์)
- Currently(ํ์ฌ): Taxed based on the total estate.(์ ์ฒด ์ ์ฐ ๊ธฐ์ค ๊ณผ์ธ)
- In the future(ํฅํ): A shift toward taxation based on each heirโs share is being considered (target: 2028).(์์์ธ๋ณ ๊ณผ์ธ ๋ฐฉ์ ์ ํ ๊ฒํ (2028 ๋ชฉํ))
โ Key Points(ํต์ฌ ํฌ์ธํธ)
- Improves tax fairness by taxing individuals based on what they actually receive.(๊ณผ์ธ ํํ์ฑ ๊ฐ์ (๊ฐ์ ๋ฐ์ ๋งํผ ๊ณผ์ธ))
- Aligns with international standards followed by many OECD countries.(๊ตญ์ ๊ธฐ์ค(OECD ๋ค์ ๊ตญ๊ฐ)๊ณผ ์ ๋ ฌ)
โ Implications(์์ฌ์ )
- Tax burdens may vary more depending on family structure.(๊ฐ์กฑ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์ธ๊ธ ์ฐจ์ด ํ๋)
- The importance of inheritance planning is expected to increase.(์์ ํ๋ ์ค๊ณ ์ค์์ฑ โ)

๐ Global Tax Issues(ํด์ธ ์กฐ์ธ ์ด์)
๐ โMinimum tax rates(์ต์ ์ธ์จ) + standardized rules(๊ท์ ํต์ผ)โ โ A shift from tax competition to regulatory competition(์กฐ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์ โ ๊ท์ ๊ฒฝ์ ์ ํ)
1. Full Implementation of the Global Minimum Tax (Pillar Two)(๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ์ต์ ํ์ธ(Pillar 2) ๋ณธ๊ฒฉ ์ํ)
- A minimum corporate tax rate of 15% is applied to multinational enterprises.(๋ค๊ตญ์ ๊ธฐ์ ๋์ ์ต์ ๋ฒ์ธ์ธ์จ 15% ์ ์ฉ)
- In 2026, the system enters the actual reporting and operational phase.(2026๋ : ์ค์ ์ ๊ณ ยท์ด์ ๋จ๊ณ ์ง์ )
โ Key Points(ํต์ฌ ํฌ์ธํธ)
- Prevents tax avoidance (addressing base erosion).(์กฐ์ธํํผ ๋ฐฉ์ง (Base Erosion ๋์))
- Approximately 140 countries are participating.(์ฝ 140๊ฐ๊ตญ ์ฐธ์ฌ)
โ Implications(์์ฌ์ )
- For global corporations(๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ๊ธฐ์
):
- Tax strategy is shifting from โtax minimizationโ to โregulatory compliance.โ(์ธ๊ธ ์ ๋ต โ โ์ ์ธ โ ๊ท์ ์ค์โ๋ก ์ ํ)
- For governments(๊ตญ๊ฐ):
- Corporate tax competitiveness is becoming less about tax rates and more about policy stability and regulatory certainty.(๋ฒ์ธ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์๋ ฅ โ ์ธ์จ๋ณด๋ค ์ ๋ ์์ ์ฑ ์ค์)
2. Enhancements to the OECD Pillar Two Framework(OECD Pillar 2 ์ ๋ ๋ณด์)
- The introduction of a Side-by-Side system helps prevent double taxation.(๋ณํ์ฒด๊ณ(Side-by-Side) ๋์ โ ์ด์ค๊ณผ์ธ ๋ฐฉ์ง)
- There is also expanded recognition of tax incentives for real economic investments.(์ค๋ฌผํฌ์ ์ธ์ ์ธ์ผํฐ๋ธ ์ธ์ ํ๋)
โ Key Points(ํต์ฌ ํฌ์ธํธ)
- A balance between investment promotion and stronger taxation.(โํฌ์์ ๋ vs ๊ณผ์ธ๊ฐํโ ๊ท ํ)
- Measures are included to ease the burden on businesses.(๊ธฐ์ ๋ถ๋ด ์ํ ์ฅ์น ํฌํจ)
โ Implications(์์ฌ์ )
- Favorable conditions for companies engaged in R&D and capital investments.(R&Dยท์ค๋น ํฌ์ ๊ธฐ์ ์ ์ ๋ฆฌ)
- Competition among countries to attract investment is expected to continue.(๊ตญ๊ฐ ๊ฐ ํฌ์ ์ ์น ๊ฒฝ์์ ๊ณ์ ์ ์ง)
3. Global Tax Environment(๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ์ธ๋ฌด ํ๊ฒฝ): โIncreasing Complexity(๋ณต์ก์ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ)โ
- 84% of companies expect greater tax disclosure requirements in the future.(๊ธฐ์ 84%: ํฅํ ์ธ๋ฌด ๊ณต๊ฐ ํ๋ ์์)
- As regulations increase, compliance costs are rising significantly.(๊ท์ ์ฆ๊ฐ โ ์ปดํ๋ผ์ด์ธ์ค ๋น์ฉ ๊ธ์ฆ)
โ Key Points(ํต์ฌ ํฌ์ธํธ)
- Tax is no longer just a cost, but a management risk.(์ธ๊ธ = ๋จ์ ๋น์ฉ์ด ์๋ โ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ฆฌ์คํฌโ)
- There is growing adoption of digital and AI-based tax management systems.(๋์งํธยทAI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ ์ธ๋ฌด๊ด๋ฆฌ ์ฆ๊ฐ)
โ Implications(์์ฌ์ )
- For companies(๊ธฐ์ ): Strengthening tax organizations and systems is becoming essential.(์ธ๋ฌด ์กฐ์งยท์์คํ ๊ฐํ ํ์)
- For individuals(๊ฐ์ธ): Overseas investments are increasingly associated with higher tax risks.(ํด์ธ ํฌ์ โ ์ธ๊ธ ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ ์ฆ๊ฐ)

- ํ๊ตญ๊ฒฝ์ ์ธ๊ธ ๋ด์ค (2026.06)
- Deloitte ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ์ธ๋ฌด ์ ์ฑ ๋ณด๊ณ ์(2026)
- OECD ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ์ต์ ํ์ธ(Pillar2) ์๋ฃ
- 2026 ์์์ธ ๊ฐํธ ๊ด๋ จ ์๋ฃ ์ข ํฉ